Paper detail

A scalar version of the Caflisch-Luke paradox

Consider an infinite cloud of hard spheres sedimenting in a Stokes flow in the whole space $\mathbb R^d$. Despite many contributions in fluid mechanics and applied mathematics, there is so far no rigorous definition of the associated effective sedimentation velocity. Calculations by Caflisch and Luke in dimension $d=3$ suggest that the effective velocity is well-defined for hard spheres distributed according to a weakly correlated and dilute point process, and that the variance of the sedimentation speed is infinite. This constitutes the Caflisch-Luke paradox. In this contribution, we consider a scalar version of this problem that displays the same difficulties in terms of interaction between the differential operator and the randomness, but is simpler in terms of PDE analysis. For a class of hardcore point processes we rigorously prove that the effective velocity is well-defined in dimensions $d>2$, and that the variance is finite in dimensions $d>4$, confirming the formal calculations by Caflisch and Luke, and opening a way to the systematic study of such problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.