Paper detail

A Rule-based Language for Application Integration

Although message-based (business) application integration is based on orchestrated message flows, current modeling languages exclusively cover (parts of) the control flow, while under-specifying the data flow. Especially for more data-intensive integration scenarios, this fact adds to the inherent data processing weakness in conventional integration systems. We argue that with a more data-centric integration language and a relational logic based implementation of integration semantics, optimizations from the data management domain(e.g., data partitioning, parallelization) can be combined with common integration processing (e.g., scatter/gather, splitter/gather). With the Logic Integration Language (LiLa) we redefine integration logic tailored for data-intensive processing and propose a novel approach to data-centric integration modeling, from which we derive the control-and data flow and apply them to a conventional integration system.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.