Paper detail

A Rotatable Stabiliser for the Control of Pitch and Yaw in a Radio-controlled Aircraft

This research implements a design for the control of a rotatable stabiliser which, it is proposed, might augment, or fully replace, the conventional control mechanisms for pitch and yaw in certain types of aircraft. The anticipated advantages of such a device are around 25% less drag, for a capability which ranges between equivalent and greater than twofold that of a conventional tail. The tail of a popular, radio-controlled, model aircraft is replaced with a rotatable stabiliser and its rotation is effected by way of a continuously-rotating servo, modified with a potentiometer. Two hollow, carbon-fibre shafts (one sleeved within the other so as to allow free rotation) serve as the mechanical link between the servo and the tail. Inserting wiring along the full length of the innermost shaft and incorporating three slip rings into its collar, at the forward, servo end, facilitated an electrical supply to the tail. A mapping betweeen the position of the controls and states of the stabiliser is formulated. Small and continuous adjustments cause the stabiliser to rotate in the opposite direction to the controls (when viewed from aft) and the deflection of the hinged control surface is proportional to the radial displacement of the controls from their centred position. For what would amount to large and contradictory rotations of the device in terms of this protocol (rotations greater than 90$^\circ$), the desired configuration can be more efficiently achieved by regarding the device's original orientation to differ by 180$^\circ$ from what it actually is and by reversing the sign of the deflection. One consequence of this latter mode of control is that a symmetrical aerofoil is indicated. General flight, including static longitudinal and directional stability, was not found to be compromised.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.