Paper detail

A robust two-parameter description of the stellar profile of elliptical galaxies

The stellar density profile a galaxy is typically summarised with two numbers: total stellar mass and half-light radius. The total mass of a galaxy, however, is not a well-defined quantity, due to the finite depth of photometric observations and the arbitrariness of the distinction between galaxy and diffuse intra-group light. This limits our ability to make accurate comparisons between models and observations. I wish to provide a more robust two-parameter description of the stellar density distribution of elliptical galaxies, in terms of quantities that can be measured unambiguously. I propose to use the stellar mass enclosed within 10 kpc in projection, $M_{*,10}$, and the mass-weighted stellar density slope within the same aperture, $Γ_{*,10}$, for this purpose. I measured the distribution in $M_{*,10}$ and $Γ_{*,10}$ of a sample of elliptical galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey, using photometry from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey. The pair of values of $(M_{*,10},Γ_{*,10})$ can be used to predict the stellar density profile in the inner 10 kpc of a galaxy with better than 20% accuracy. Similarly, $M_{*,10}$ and $Γ_{*,10}$ can be combined to obtain a proxy for stellar velocity dispersion at least as good as the stellar mass fundamental plane. As a first application, I then compared the observed $M_{*,10}-Γ_{*,10}$ relation of elliptical galaxies with that of similarly selected galaxies in the EAGLE Reference simulation. Observed and simulated galaxies match at $M_{*,10}=10^{11}M_\odot$, but the EAGLE $M_{*,10}-Γ_{*,10}$ relation is shallower and has a larger intrinsic scatter compared to observations. This new parameterisation of the stellar density profile of massive elliptical galaxies provides a more robust way of comparing results from different photometric surveys and from hydrodynamical simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.