Paper detail

A robust lower limit on the amplitude of matter fluctuations in the universe from cluster abundance and weak lensing

Cluster abundance measurements are among the most sensitive probes of the amplitude of matter fluctuations in the universe, which in turn can help constrain other cosmological parameters, like the dark energy equation of state or neutrino mass. However, difficulties in calibrating the relation between the cluster observable and halo mass, and the lack of completeness information, make this technique particularly susceptible to systematic errors. Here we argue that a cluster abundance analysis using statistical weak lensing on the stacked clusters leads to a robust lower limit on the amplitude of fluctuations. The method compares the average weak lensing signal measured around the whole cluster sample to a theoretical prediction, assuming that the clusters occupy the centers of all of the most massive halos above some minimum mass threshold. If the amplitude of fluctuations is below a certain limiting value, there are too few massive clusters in this model and the theoretical prediction falls below the observations. Since any effects that modify the model assumptions can only decrease the theoretical prediction, the limiting amplitude becomes a robust lower limit. Here, we apply it to a volume limited sample of 16,000 group/cluster candidates identified from isolated luminous red galaxies (LRGs) in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We find $σ_8 (Ω_m/0.25)^{0.5}>0.62$ at the 95% c.l. after taking into account observational errors in the lensing analysis. While this is a relatively weak constraint, both the scatter in the LRG luminosity-halo mass relation and the lensing errors are large; the constraints could improve considerably in the future with more sophisticated cluster identification algorithms and smaller errors in the lensing analysis. [Abridged]

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.