Paper detail

A rigorous version of R. P. Brent's model for the binary Euclidean algorithm

The binary Euclidean algorithm is a modification of the classical Euclidean algorithm for computation of greatest common divisors which avoids ordinary integer division in favour of division by powers of two only. The expectation of the number of steps taken by the binary Euclidean algorithm when applied to pairs of integers of bounded size was first investigated by R. P. Brent in 1976 via a heuristic model of the algorithm as a random dynamical system. Based on numerical investigations of the expectation of the associated Ruelle transfer operator, Brent obtained a conjectural asymptotic expression for the mean number of steps performed by the algorithm when processing pairs of odd integers whose size is bounded by a large integer. In 1998 B. Vallée modified Brent's model via an induction scheme to rigorously prove an asymptotic formula for the average number of steps performed by the algorithm; however, the relationship of this result with Brent's heuristics remains conjectural. In this article we establish previously conjectural properties of Brent's transfer operator, showing directly that it possesses a spectral gap and preserves a unique continuous density. This density is shown to extend holomorphically to the complex right half-plane and to have a logarithmic singularity at zero. By combining these results with methods from classical analytic number theory we prove the correctness of three conjectured formulae for the expected number of steps, resolving several open questions promoted by D. E. Knuth in The Art of Computer Programming.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.