Paper detail

A Revisit of the Masuda Flare

We revisit the flare on 1992 January 13, which is now universally termed the "Masuda flare". The revisit is motivated not only by its uniqueness despite accumulating observations of \hxr coronal emission, but also by the improvement of Yohkoh hard X-ray imaging, which was achieved after the intensive investigations on this celebrated event. Through an uncertainty analysis, we show that the hard X-ray coronal source is located much closer to the soft X-ray loop in the re-calibrated HXT images than in the original ones. Specifically, the centroid of the M1-band (23--33 keV) coronal source is above the brightest pixel of the SXT loop by ~5000+/-1000 km (~9600 km in the original data); and above the apex of the 30% brightness contour of the SXT loop by ~2000+/-1000 km (~7000 km in the original data). We suggest that this change may naturally account for the fact that the spectrum of the coronal emission was reported to be extremely hard below ~20 keV in the pre-calibration investigations, whereas it has been considerably softer in the literature since Sato's re-calibration circa 1999. Still, the coronal spectrum is flatter at lower energies than at higher energies, owing to the lack of a similar source in the L-band (14--23 keV), which remains a puzzle.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.