Paper detail

A review of the tension between the T2K and NO$ν$A appearance data and hints to new physics

In this article, we review the status of the tension between the long-baseline accelerator neutrino experiments T2K and NO$ν$A. The tension arises mostly due to the mismatch in the appearance data of the two experiments. We explain how this tension arises based on $ν_μ\to ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\to \barν_e$ oscillation probabilities. We define the reference point of vacuum oscillation, maximal $θ_{23}$ and $δ_{CP}=0$ and compute the $ν_e/\barν_e$ appearance events for each experiment. We then study the effects of deviating the unknown parameters from the reference point and the compatibility of any given set of values of unknown parameters with the data from T2K and NO$ν$A. T2K observes a large excess in the $ν_e$ appearance event sample compared to the expected $ν_e$ events at the reference point, whereas \nova observes a moderate excess. The large excess in T2K dictates that $δ_{CP}$ be anchored at $-90^\circ$ and that $θ_{23}>π/4$ with a preference for normal hierarchy. The moderate excess at NO$ν$A leads to two degenerate solutions: A) NH, $0<δ_{CP}<180^\circ$, and $θ_{23}>π/4$; B) IH, $-180^\circ<δ_{CP}<0$, and $θ_{23}>π/4$. This is the main cause of the tension between the two experiments. We have reviewed the status of three beyond standard model (BSM) physics scenarios, (a) non-unitary mixing, (b) Lorentz invariance violation and (c) non-standard neutrino interactions, to resolve the tension.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.