Paper detail

A reflection equivalence for Gorenstein-projective quiver representations

For $Λ$ a selfinjective algebra, and $Q$ a finite quiver without oriented cycles, the algebra $ΛQ$ is a Gorenstein algebra and the category ${\rm Gproj}ΛQ$ of Gorenstein-projective $ΛQ$-modules is a Frobenius category. For a sink $v$ of $Q$, we define a functor $F(v) : \underline{\rm Gproj}ΛQ\to \underline{\rm Gproj}ΛQ(v)$ between the stable categories modulo projectives, where $Q(v)$ is obtained from $Q$ by changing the direction of each arrow ending in $v$. The functor is given by an explicit construction on the level of objects and homomorphisms. Our main result states that $F(v)$ is an equivalence of categories. In the case where the underlying graph of $Q$ is a tree, we deduce that the stable category $\underline{\rm Gproj}ΛQ$ does not depend on the orientation of $Q$. Moreover, if $Q$ is a quiver of type $\mathbb A_3$ and $Λ=k[T]/(T^n)$ the bounded polynomial algebra, we use the symmetry of the octahedron in the octahedral axiom to verify that the composition of twelve reflections yields the identity on objects.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.