Paper detail

A refinement of the Shuffle Conjecture with cars of two sizes and $t=1/q$

The original Shuffle Conjecture of Haglund et al. has a symmetric function side and a combinatorial side. The symmetric function side may be simply expressed as $<\nabla e_n, h_μ>$ where \nabla is the Macdonald polynomial eigen-operator of Bergeron and Garsia and $h_μ$ is the homogeneous basis indexed by $μ=(μ_1,μ_2,...,μ_k)$ partitions of n. The combinatorial side q,t-enumerates a family of Parking Functions whose reading word is a shuffle of k successive segments of 1,2,3,...,n of respective lengths $μ_1,μ_2,...,μ_k$. It can be shown that for t=1/q the symmetric function side reduces to a product of q-binomial coefficients and powers of q. This reduction suggests a surprising combinatorial refinement of the general Shuffle Conjecture. Here we prove this refinement for k=2 and t=1/q. The resulting formula gives a q-analogue of the well studied Narayana numbers.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.