Paper detail

A redshift - observation-time relation for gamma-ray bursts: evidence of a distinct sub-luminous population

We show how the redshift and peak-flux distributions of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have an observation time dependence that can be used to discriminate between different burst populations. We demonstrate how observation time relations can be derived from the standard integral distributions and that they can differentiate between GRB populations detected by both the BATSE and \emph{Swift} satellites. Using \emph{Swift} data we show that a redshift--observation-time relation (log\,$Z$\,--\,log\,$T$) is consistent with both a peak-flux\,--\,observation time relation (log\,$P$\,--\,log\,$T$) and a standard log\,$N$\,--\,log\,$P$ brightness distribution. As the method depends only on rarer small-$z$ events, it is invariant to high-$z$ selection effects. We use the log\,$Z$\,--\,log\,$T$ relation to show that sub-luminous GRBs are a distinct population occurring at a higher rate of order $150^{+180}_{-90} \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. Our analysis suggests that GRB 060505 -- a relatively nearby GRB observed without any associated supernova -- is consistent with a sub-luminous population of bursts. Finally, we suggest that our relations can be used as a consistency test for some of the proposed GRB spectral energy correlations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.