Paper detail

A recommender system for automatic picking of subsurface formation tops

Geoscience domain experts traditionally correlate formation tops in the subsurface using geophysical well logs (known as well-log correlation) by-hand. Based on individual well log interpretation and well-to-well comparisons, these correlations are done in the context of depositional models within a stratigraphic framework. Recently, many researchers have focused on automatic well-log correlation using a variety of warping algorithms that measure well similarity, and both unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods that assign categorical labels based on known tops in many other wells. These methods require a standardized suite of digital well logs (i.e. gamma ray logs for every well) along with the depth to the top of the formations, which might not be available in many cases. Herein, we propose a method that does not use geophysical well logs for correlation, but rather uses already picked tops in multiple wells to recommend the depth to the remaining unpicked tops in the wells. This recommender system calculates the depth to all formation tops in all the wells for two different datasets in two different basins. The Teapot Dome dataset is composed of lithostratigraphic formation tops, and the Mannville Group dataset is composed of sequence-stratigraphic (representing multiple lithologic groups within a stratigraphic unit) formation tops. For the demonstration, mean absolute error and root mean squared error of four-fold cross-validation compares the recommender system predictions to the ground truth human interpretations. The recommender system is competitive and often outperforms state of the art spline interpolation methods. Lastly, increasing the size of the training dataset decreases the prediction error, and that variance in error decreases with increasing formation tops picked in each formation and well for the lithostratigraphic top picks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.