Paper detail

A recalibration of optical photometry: Tycho-2, Strömgren, and Johnson systems

I use HST spectrophotometry to analyze the calibration of 3 optical photometry systems: Tycho-2 B_T V_T, Strömgren u v b y, and Johnson U B V. For Tycho-2, I revisit the analysis of Maíz Apellániz (2005) to include the new recalibration of grating/aperture corrections, vignetting, and charge transfer inefficiency effects produced by the STIS group and to consider the consequences of both random and systematic uncertainties. The new results reaffirm the good quality of both the Tycho-2 photometry and the HST spectrophotometry, but yield a slightly different value for ZP_B_T-V_T. For the Strömgren v, b, and y and the Johnson B and V filters I find that the published sensitivity curves are consistent with the available photometry and spectrophotometry and I derive new values for the associated ZP_b-y, ZP_m_1, and ZP_B-V. The situation is different for the Strömgren u and the Johnson U filters. There I find that the published sensitivity curves yield results that are inconsistent with the available photometry and spectrophotometry, likely caused by an incorrect treatment of atmospheric effects in the short-wavelength end. I reanalyze the data to produce new average sensitivity curves for those two filters and new values for ZP_c_1 and ZP_U-B. The new computation of synthetic U-B and B-V colors uses a single B sensitivity curve, which eliminates the previous unphysical existence of two different definitions. Finally, I find that if one uses values from the literature where uncertainties are not given, reasonable estimates for these are 1-2% for Strömgren b-y, m_1, and c_1 and 2-3% for Johnson B-V and U-B. The use of the results in this article should lead to a significant reduction of systematic errors when comparing synthetic photometry models with real colors and indices.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.