Paper detail

A reassessment of the redshift distribution and physical properties of luminous (sub-)millimetre galaxies

Motivated by the current controversy over the redshift distribution and physical properties of luminous (sub-)mm sources, we have undertaken a new study of the brightest sample of unlensed (sub-)mm sources with pre-ALMA interferometric follow-up in the COSMOS field. Exploiting the very latest multi-frequency supporting data, we find that this sample displays a redshift distribution indistinguishable from that of the lensed sources uncovered with the South Pole Telescope (SPT), with z_median ~ 3.5. We also find that, over the redshift range z ~ 2-6 the median stellar mass of the most luminous (sub-)mm sources is M_* ~ 3 * 10^11 M_odot, yielding a typical specific star-formation rate sSFR ~ 3 Gyr^-1. Consistent with recent ALMA and SMA studies, we confirm that source blending is not a serious issue in the study of luminous (sub-)mm sources uncovered by ground-based, single-dish surveys; only ~ 10-15% of bright (S_850 ~ 5 - 10 mJy) (sub-)mm sources arise from significant (i.e. >20%) blends, and so our conclusions are largely unaffected by whether we adopt the original single-dish mm/sub-mm flux-densities/positions, or the interferometric data. Our results suggest that apparent disagreements over the redshift distribution of (sub-)mm sources are a result of "down-sizing" in dust-enshrouded star-formation, consistent with existing knowledge of the star-formation histories of massive galaxies. They also indicate that extreme star-forming galaxies at high redshift are, on average, subject to the same star-formation rate-limiting processes as less luminous objects, and lie on the "main sequence" of star-forming galaxies at z>3.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.