Paper detail

A Re-examination of the isometric embedding approach to General Relativity

We consider gravitational field equations which are Einstein equations written in terms of embedding coordinates in some higher dimensional Minkowski space. Our main focus is to address some tricky issues relating to the Cauchy problem and possible non-equivalence with the intrinsic Einstein theory. The well known theory introduced by Regge and Teitelboim in 9+1 dimensions is cast in Cauchy-Kowalevskaya form and therefore local existence and uniqueness results follow for \emph{analytic} initial data. In seeking a weakening of the regularity conditions for initial data, we are led naturally to propose a 13+1 dimensional theory. By imposing an appropriate conserved initial value constraint we are able, in the neighbourhood of a generic (free) embedding, to obtain a system of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations. The questions of long time or global existence and uniqueness are formidable, but we offer arguments to suggest that the situation is not hopeless if the theory is modified in an appropriate way. We also present a modification of the perturbation method of Günther to weighted Sobolev spaces, appropriate to noncompact initial data surfaces with asymptotic fall-off conditions.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.