Paper detail

A Rapid Ionization Change in the Nebular-Phase Spectra of the Type Ia SN 2011fe

We present three new spectra of the nearby Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) 2011fe covering $\approx 480-850~$days after maximum light and show that the ejecta undergoes a rapid ionization shift at $\sim 500~$days after explosion. The prominent [FeIII] emission lines at $\approx 4600~$Å are replaced with the permitted FeI+FeII blends at $\sim 4400~$Å and $\sim 5400~$Å. The $\approx 7300~$Å feature, which is produced by [FeII]+[NiII] at $\lesssim 400~$days after explosion, is replaced by broad ($\approx \pm 15\,000~\rm{km}~\rm{s}^{-1}$) symmetric [CaII] emission. Models predict this ionization transition occurring $\sim 100$ days later than what is observed, which we attribute to clumping in the ejecta. Finally, we use the nebular-phase spectra to test several proposed progenitor scenarios for SN2011fe. Non-detections of H and He exclude nearby non-degenerate companions, [OI] non-detections disfavor the violent merger of two white dwarfs, and the symmetric emission-line profiles favor a symmetric explosion.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.