Paper detail

A Ranking Algorithm for Re-finding

Re-finding files from a personal computer is a frequent demand to users. When encountered a difficult re-finding task, people may not recall the attributes used by conventional re-finding methods, such as a file's path, file name, keywords etc., the re-finding would fail. We proposed a method to support difficult re-finding tasks. By asking the user a list of questions about the target, such as a document's pages, author numbers, accumulated reading time, last reading location etc. Then use the user's answers to filter out the target. After the user answered a list of questions about the target file, we evaluate the user's familiar degree about the target file based on the answers. We devise a ranking algorithm which sorts the candidates by comparing the user's familiarity degree about the target and the candidates. We also propose a method to generate re-finding tasks artificially based on the user's own document corpus.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.