Paper detail

A randomised lattice rule algorithm with pre-determined generating vector and random number of points for Korobov spaces with $0 < α\le 1/2$

In previous work (Kuo, Nuyens, Wilkes, 2023), we showed that a lattice rule with a pre-determined generating vector but random number of points can achieve the near optimal convergence of $O(n^{-α-1/2+ε})$, $ε> 0$, for the worst case expected error, commonly referred to as the randomised error, for numerical integration of high-dimensional functions in the Korobov space with smoothness $α> 1/2$. Compared to the optimal deterministic rate of $O(n^{-α+ε})$, $ε> 0$, such a randomised algorithm is capable of an extra half in the rate of convergence. In this paper, we show that a pre-determined generating vector also exists in the case of $0 < α\le 1/2$. Also here we obtain the near optimal convergence of $O(n^{-α-1/2+ε})$, $ε> 0$; or in more detail, we obtain $O(\sqrt{r} \, n^{-α-1/2+1/(2r)+ε&#39;})$ which holds for any choices of $ε&#39; > 0$ and $r \in \mathbb{N}$ with $r > 1/(2α)$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.