Paper detail

A random version of Sperner's theorem

Let $\mathcal{P}(n)$ denote the power set of $[n]$, ordered by inclusion, and let $\mathcal{P}(n,p)$ be obtained from $\mathcal{P}(n)$ by selecting elements from $\mathcal{P}(n)$ independently at random with probability $p$. A classical result of Sperner asserts that every antichain in $\mathcal{P}(n)$ has size at most that of the middle layer, $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. In this note we prove an analogous result for $\mathcal{P} (n,p)$: If $pn \rightarrow \infty$ then, with high probability, the size of the largest antichain in $\mathcal{P}(n,p)$ is at most $(1+o(1)) p \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. This solves a conjecture of Osthus who proved the result in the case when $pn/\log n \rightarrow \infty$. Our condition on $p$ is best-possible. In fact, we prove a more general result giving an upper bound on the size of the largest antichain for a wider range of values of $p$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.