Paper detail

A Queueing Model of Patient Flow for Stroke Networks to Estimate Acute Stroke Transfer Capacity

Background: Most acute stroke (AS) patients in the United States are initially evaluated at a primary stroke center (PSC) and a significant proportion requires transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for advanced treatment. A CSC typically accepts patients from multiple PSCs in its network, leading to capacity limits. This study uses a queueing model to estimate impacts on CSC capacity due to transfers from PSCs. Methods: The model assumes that the number of AS patients arriving at each PSC, proportion of AS patients transferred, and length of stay in the CSC Neurologic Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) by type of AS are random, while the transfer rates of ischemic and hemorrhagic AS patients are control variables. The main outcome measure is the "overflow" probability, namely, the probability of a CSC not having capacity (unavailability of a Neuro-ICU bed) to accept a transfer. Data simulations of the model, using a base case and an expanded case, were performed to illustrate the effects of changing key parameters, such as transfer rates from PSCs and CSC Neuro-ICU capacity on overflow capacity. Results: Data simulations of the model using a base case show that an increase of a PSC's ischemic stroke transfer rate from 15% to 55% raises the overflow probability from 30.62% to 36.13%. Further simulations of the expanded case show that to maintain an a priori CSC overflow probability of 30.62% when adding a PSC with a AS transfer rate of 15% to the network, other PSCs would need to decrease their transfer rate by 12.5% or the CSC Neuro-ICU would need to add 2 beds. Discussion: A queuing model can be used to estimate the effects of change in the size of a PSC-CSC network, change in AS transfer rates, or change in number of CSC Neuro-ICU beds of a CSC on its capacity on the overflow probability in the CSC.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.