Paper detail

A quasilinear problem in two parameters depending on the gradient

The existence of positive solutions is considered for the Dirichlet problem \[ \left\{ \begin{array} [c]{rcll}% -Δ_{p}u & = & λω_{1}(x)\left\vert u\right\vert ^{q-2}% u+βω_{2}(x)\left\vert u\right\vert ^{a-1}u|\nabla u|^{b} & \text{in }Ω\\ u & = & 0 & \text{on }\partialΩ, \end{array} \right. \] where $λ$ and $β$ are positive parameters, $a$ and $b$ are positive constants satisfying $a+b\leq p-1$, $ω_{1}(x)$ and $ω_{2}(x)$ are nonnegative weights and $1<q\leq p$. The homogeneous case $q=p$ is handled by making $q\rightarrow p^{-}$ in the sublinear case $1<q<p,$ which is based on the sub- and super-solution method. The core of the proof of this problem is then generalized to the Dirichlet problem $-Δ_{p}u=f(x,u,\nabla u)$ in $Ω$, where $f$ is a nonnegative, continuous function satisfying simple, geometrical hypotheses. This approach might be considered as a unification of arguments dispersed in various papers, with the advantage of handling also nonlinearities that depend on the gradient, even in the $p$-growth case. It is then applied to the problem $-Δ_{p}u=λω(x)u^{q-1}\left( 1+|\nabla u|^{p}\right) $ with Dirichlet boundary conditions in the domain $Ω$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.