Paper detail

A Quasi-Stationary Solution to Gliese 436b's Eccentricity

We investigate the possibility that the large orbital eccentricity of the transiting Neptune-mass planet Gliese 436b is maintained in the face of tidal dissipation by a second planet in the system. We find that the currently observed configuration can be understood if Gliese 436b and a putative companion have evolved to a quasi-stationary fixed point in which the planets' orbital apses are co-linear and in which secular variations in the orbital eccentricities of the two planets have been almost entirely damped out. We adopt an octopole-order secular theory based on a Legendre expansion in the semi-major axis ratio to delineate well-defined regions of (P_c, M_c, e_c) space that can be occupied by a perturbing companion. We incorporate the evolutionary effect of tidal dissipation into our secular model of the system, and solve the resulting initial value problems for a large sample of the allowed configurations. We then polish the stationary configurations derived from secular theory with full numerical integrations. We present our results in the form of candidate companion planets to Gliese 436b. For these candidates, radial velocity half-amplitudes, K_c, are of order 3 m/s, and the maximum amplitude of orbit-to-orbit transit timing variations are of order Delta t=1 s to Delta t=5s. For the particular example case of a perturber with orbital period, P_c=40 d, mass, M_c=8.5 M_Earth, and eccentricity, e_c=0.58, we confirm our semi-analytic calculations with a full numerical 3-body integration of the orbital decay that includes tidal damping and spin evolution. Additionally, we discuss the possibility of many-perturber stationary configurations, utilizing modified Laplace-Lagrange secular theory.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.