Paper detail

A quantum simulation of dissociative ionization of $H_2^+$ in full dimensionality with time dependent surface flux method

The dissociative ionization of $H_2^+$ in a linearly polarized, 400 nm laser pulse is simulated by solving a three-particle time-dependent Schrödinger equation in full dimensionality without using any data from quantum chemistry computation. The joint energy spectrum (JES) is computed using a time-dependent surface flux (tSurff) method, the details of which are given. The calculated ground energy is -0.597 atomic units and internuclear distance is 1.997 atomic units if the kinetic energy term of protons is excluded, consistent with the reported precise values from quantum chemistry computation. If the kinetic term of the protons is included, the ground energy is -0.592 atomic units with an internuclear distance 2.05 atomic units. Energy sharing is observed in JES and we find peak of the JES with respect to nuclear kinetic energy release (KER) is within $2\sim4$ eV, which is different from the previous two dimensional computations (over 10 eV), but is close to the reported experimental values. The projected energy distribution on azimuth angles shows that the electron and the protons tend to dissociate in the direction of polarization of the laser pulse.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.