Paper detail

A quantum mechanical bound for CHSH-type Bell inequalities

Many typical Bell experiments can be described as follows. A source repeatedly distributes particles among two spacelike separated observers. Each of them makes a measurement, using an observable randomly chosen out of several possible ones, leading to one of two possible outcomes. After collecting a sufficient amount of data one calculates the value of a so-called Bell expression. An important question in this context is whether the result is compatible with bounds based on the assumptions of locality, realism and freedom of choice. Here we are interested in bounds on the obtained value derived from quantum theory, so-called Tsirelson bounds. We describe a simple Tsirelson bound, which is based on a singular value decomposition. This mathematical result leads to some physical insights. In particular the optimal observables can be obtained. Furthermore statements about the dimension of the underlying Hilbert space are possible. Finally, Bell inequalities can be modified to match rotated measurement settings, e.g. if the two parties do not share a common reference frame.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.