Paper detail

A quantum chemical study from a molecular perspective: ionization and electron attachment energies for species often used to fabricate single-molecule junctions

The accurate determination of the lowest electron attachment ($EA$) and ionization ($IP$) energies for molecules embedded in molecular junctions is important for correctly estimating, \emph{e.g.}, the magnitude of the currents ($I$) or the biases ($V$) where an $I-V$-curve exhibits a significant non-Ohmic behavior. Benchmark calculations for the lowest electron attachment and ionization energies of several typical molecules utilized to fabricate single-molecule junctions characterized by n-type conduction (4,4'-bipyridine, 1,4-dicyanobenzene, and 4,4'-dicyano-1,1'-biphenyl) and p-type conduction (benzenedithiol, biphenyldithiol, hexanemonothiol, and hexanedithiol] based on the EOM-CCSD (equation-of-motion coupled-cluster singles and doubles) state-of-the-art method of quantum chemistry are presented. They indicate significant differences from the results obtained within current approaches to molecular transport. The present study emphasizes that, in addition to a reliable quantum chemical method, basis sets much better than the ubiquitous double-zeta set employed for transport calculations are needed. The latter is a particularly critical issue for correctly determining $EA$'s, which is impossible without including sufficient diffuse basis functions. The spatial distribution of the dominant molecular orbitals (MO's) is another important issue, on which the present study draws attention, because it sensitively affects the MO-energy shifts $Φ$ due to image charges formed in electrodes. The present results cannot substantiate the common assumption of a point-like MO midway between electrodes, which substantially affects the actual $Φ$-values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.