Paper detail

A quantitative performance analysis for Stokes solvers at the extreme scale

This article presents a systematic quantitative performance analysis for large finite element computations on extreme scale computing systems. Three parallel iterative solvers for the Stokes system, discretized by low order tetrahedral elements, are compared with respect to their numerical efficiency and their scalability running on up to $786\,432$ parallel threads. A genuine multigrid method for the saddle point system using an Uzawa-type smoother provides the best overall performance with respect to memory consumption and time-to-solution. The largest system solved on a Blue Gene/Q system has more than ten trillion ($1.1 \cdot 10 ^{13}$) unknowns and requires about 13 minutes compute time. Despite the matrix free and highly optimized implementation, the memory requirement for the solution vector and the auxiliary vectors is about 200 TByte. Brandt's notion of "textbook multigrid efficiency" is employed to study the algorithmic performance of iterative solvers. A recent extension of this paradigm to "parallel textbook multigrid efficiency" makes it possible to assess also the efficiency of parallel iterative solvers for a given hardware architecture in absolute terms. The efficiency of the method is demonstrated for simulating incompressible fluid flow in a pipe filled with spherical obstacles.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.