Paper detail

A Quantitative Doignon-Bell-Scarf Theorem

The famous Doignon-Bell-Scarf Theorem is a Helly-type result about the existence of integer solutions on systems of linear inequalities. The purpose of this paper is to present the following quantitative generalization: Given an integer $k$, we prove that there exists a constant $c(n,k)$, depending only on the dimension $n$ and $k$, such that if a polyhedron ${x: Ax \leq b}$ contains exactly k integer solutions, then there exists a subset of the rows, of cardinality no more than $c(n,k)$, defining a polyhedron that contains exactly the same $k$ integer points. In this case $c(n,0) = 2^n$ is the original case of Doignon-Bell-Scarf for infeasible systems of inequalities. We work on both upper and lower bounds for the constant $c(n,k)$ and discuss some consequences, including a Clarkson-style algorithm to find the $l$-th best solution of an integer program with respect to the ordering induced by the objective function.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.