Paper detail

A quantitative comparison of physical accuracy and numerical stability of Lattice Boltzmann color gradient and pseudopotential multicomponent models for microfluidic applications

The performances of the Color-Gradient (CG) and of the Shan-Chen (SC) multicomponent Lattice Boltzmann models are quantitatively compared side-by-side on multiple physical flow problems where breakup, coalescence and contraction of fluid ligaments are important. The flow problems are relevant to microfluidic applications, jetting of microdroplets as seen in inkjet printing, as well as emulsion dynamics. A significantly wider range of parameters is shown to be accessible for CG in terms of density-ratio, viscosity-ratio and surface tension values. Numerical stability for a high density ratio $\mathcal{O}(1000)$ is required for simulating the drop formation process during inkjet printing which we show here to be achievable using the CG model but not using the SC model. In terms of physical accuracy, the CG model shows good agreement with analytical solutions for droplet oscillation and ligament contraction test-cases. The SC model is effective in accurately simulating ligament contraction, but less accurate in handling droplet oscillations. Rayleigh-Plateau instability simulations show that both the CG and SC models give physically realistic results when breakup occurs, although smaller satellite droplets quickly vanish in the SC model due to droplet mass evaporating into the ambient phase. Our results show that the CG model is a suitable choice for challenging simulations of droplet formation, due to a combination of both numerical stability and physical accuracy. We also present a novel approach to incorporate repulsion forces between interfaces for CG, with possible applications to the study of stabilized emulsions. Specifically, we show that the CG model can produce similar results to a known multirange potentials extension of the SC model for modelling a disjoining pressure, opening up its use for the study of dense stabilized emulsions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.