Paper detail

A quantitative analysis of stellar activity based on CoRoT photometric data

The CoRoT satellite has made available high precision photometric observations of a large number of stars of different spectral types. Continuous photometric time series allow the characterization of stellar microvariability in a systematic way. We determine an index indicating the level of activity, derived from photometric data, for a large sample of stars with different color temperatures. We also assess to what extent this index can be related to an estimated Rossby number for stars whose rotation period can be estimated. We also estimate a characteristic lifetime of the surface heterogeneities. Our work is based on the Fourier analysis of stellar light curves. We analyzed the Fourier power spectra of 430 selected light curves obtained by CoRoT during three observation runs. The low-frequency contribution of the stellar variability is modelled by a "generalized semi-lorentzian" profile. An activity index is derived from the fitted amplitude and width of the semi-lorentzian model. Some of the Fourier spectra exhibit a rotational modulation which enables the determination of the rotation period. In addition, a convective turnover time is derived from a grid of stellar models, so that a Rossby number can be estimated. A characteristic lifetime of the phenomena causing the observed power at low frequency is assessed from the fitted model of the power spectrum and is compared to the rotation period. Higher values of the microvariability index are observed among the coolest stars from our sample. 28 light curves show a clear rotational modulation. The estimated Rossby number of most of the observed stars with a rotational modulation is less than 1. The activity index decreases with increasing Rossby number. The quality of the CoRoT data enables the determination of the characteristic lifetime of active structures. It is shown to increase with the rotation period.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.