Paper detail

A Quadruplet Loss for Enforcing Semantically Coherent Embeddings in Multi-output Classification Problems

This paper describes one objective function for learning semantically coherent feature embeddings in multi-output classification problems, i.e., when the response variables have dimension higher than one. In particular, we consider the problems of identity retrieval and soft biometrics labelling in visual surveillance environments, which have been attracting growing interests. Inspired by the triplet loss [34] function, we propose a generalization that: 1) defines a metric that considers the number of agreeing labels between pairs of elements; and 2) disregards the notion of anchor, replacing d(A1, A2) < d(A1, B) by d(A, B) < d(C, D), for A, B, C, D distance constraints, according to the number of agreeing labels between pairs. As the triplet loss formulation, our proposal also privileges small distances between positive pairs, but at the same time explicitly enforces that the distance between other pairs corresponds directly to their similarity in terms of agreeing labels. This yields feature embeddings with a strong correspondence between the classes centroids and their semantic descriptions, i.e., where elements are closer to others that share some of their labels than to elements with fully disjoint labels membership. As practical effect, the proposed loss can be seen as particularly suitable for performing joint coarse (soft label) + fine (ID) inference, based on simple rules as k-neighbours, which is a novelty with respect to previous related loss functions. Also, in opposition to its triplet counterpart, the proposed loss is agnostic with regard to any demanding criteria for mining learning instances (such as the semi-hard pairs). Our experiments were carried out in five different datasets (BIODI, LFW, IJB-A, Megaface and PETA) and validate our assumptions, showing highly promising results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.