Paper detail

A Property of Random Walks on a Cycle Graph

We analyze the Hunter vs Rabbit game on graph, which is a kind of model of communication in an adhoc mobile network. Let $G$ be a cycle graph with $N$ nodes. The hunter can move from a vertex to another vertex on the graph along an edge. The rabbit can move to any vertex on graph at once. We formalized the game using the random walk framework. The strategy of the rabbit is formalized using a one dimensional random walk over $\mathbb{Z}$. We classify strategies using the order $O(k^{-β-1})$ of their Fourier transformation. We investigate lower bounds and upper bounds of a probability that the hunter catches the rabbit. We found a constant lower bound if $β\in (0,1)$. That is there is not depend on the size $N$ of the graph. We show the order is equivalent to $O(1/\log N)$ if $β=1$ and a lower bound is $1/N^{(β-1)/β}$ if $β\in (1,2]$. Those results assist to choose the parameter $β$ of a rabbit strategy according to the size $N$ of the given graph. We introduce a formalization of strategies using a random walk, theoretical estimation of bounds of a probability that the hunter catches the rabbit, and we also show computing simulation results.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.