Abstract

We say that a permutation π=π1π2⋯πn∈Snπ=π_1π_2\cdots π_n \in \mathfrak{S}_n has a peak at index ii if πi−1<πi>πi+1π_{i-1} < π_i > π_{i+1}. Let P(π)\mathcal{P}(π) denote the set of indices where ππ has a peak. Given a set SS of positive integers, we define PS(n)={π∈Sn:P(π)=S}\mathcal{P}_S(n)=\{π\in\mathfrak{S}_n:\mathcal{P}(π)=S\}. In 2013 Billey, Burdzy, and Sagan showed that for subsets of positive integers SS and sufficiently large nn, ∣PS(n)∣=pS(n)2n−∣S∣−1| \mathcal{P}_S(n)|=p_S(n)2^{n-|S|-1} where pS(x)p_S(x) is a polynomial depending on SS. They gave a recursive formula for pS(x)p_S(x) involving an alternating sum, and they conjectured that the coefficients of pS(x)p_S(x) expanded in a binomial coefficient basis centered at max⁡(S)\max(S) are all nonnegative. In this paper we introduce a new recursive formula for ∣PS(n)∣|\mathcal{P}_S(n)| without alternating sums, and we use this recursion to prove that their conjecture is true.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.