Paper detail

A proof of a conjecture on trace-zero forms and shapes of number fields

In 2012 the first named author conjectured that totally real quartic fields of fundamental discriminant are determined by the isometry class of the integral trace zero form; such conjecture was based on computational evidence and the analog statement for cubic fields which was proved using Bhargava's higher composition laws on cubes. Here, using Bhargava's parametrization of quartic fields we prove the conjecture by generalizing the ideas used in the cubic case. Since at the moment, for arbitrary degrees, there is nothing like Bhargava's parametrizations we cannot deal with degrees $n > 5$ in a similar fashion. Nevertheless, using some of our previous work on trace forms we generalize this result to higher degrees; we show that if $n \ge 3$ is an integer such that $(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})^{*}$ is a cyclic group, then the shape is a complete invariant for totally real degree $n$ number fields with fundamental discriminant.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.