Paper detail

A projection-domain low-count quantitative SPECT method for alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical therapy

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides a mechanism to estimate regional isotope uptake in lesions and at-risk organs after administration of α-particle-emitting radiopharmaceutical therapies (α-RPTs). However, this estimation task is challenging due to the complex emission spectra, the very low number of detected counts, the impact of stray-radiation-related noise at these low counts, and the multiple image-degrading processes in SPECT. The conventional reconstruction-based quantification methods are observed to be erroneous for α-RPT SPECT. To address these challenges, we developed a low-count quantitative SPECT (LC-QSPECT) method that directly estimates the regional activity uptake from the projection data, compensates for stray-radiation-related noise, and for the radioisotope and SPECT physics. The method was validated in the context of three-dimensional SPECT with 223 Ra. Validation was performed using both realistic simulation studies, including a virtual clinical trial, and synthetic and anthropomorphic physical-phantom studies. Across all studies, the LC-QSPECT method yielded reliable regional-uptake estimates and outperformed the conventional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)-based reconstruction and geometric transfer matrix (GTM)-based post-reconstruction partial-volume compensation methods. Further, the method yielded reliable uptake across different lesion sizes, contrasts, and different levels of intra-lesion heterogeneity. Additionally, the variance of the estimated uptake approached the Cramé-Rao bound-defined theoretical limit.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.