Paper detail

A procedure for automated tree pruning suggestion using LiDAR scans of fruit trees

In fruit tree growth, pruning is an important management practice for preventing overcrowding, improving canopy access to light and promoting regrowth. Due to the slow nature of agriculture, decisions in pruning are typically made using tradition or rules of thumb rather than data-driven analysis. Many existing algorithmic, simulation-based approaches rely on high-fidelity digital captures or purely computer-generated fruit trees, and are unable to provide specific results on an orchard scale. We present a framework for suggesting pruning strategies on LiDAR-scanned commercial fruit trees using a scoring function with a focus on improving light distribution throughout the canopy. A scoring function to assess the quality of the tree shape based on its light availability and size was developed for comparative analysis between trees, and was validated against yield characteristics, demonstrating a reasonable correlation against fruit count with an $R^2$ score of 0.615 for avocado and 0.506 for mango. A tool was implemented for simulating pruning by algorithmically estimating which parts of a tree point cloud would be removed given specific cut points using structural analysis of the tree, validated experimentally with an average F1 score of 0.78 across 144 experiments. Finally, new pruning locations were suggested and we used the previous two stages to estimate the improvement of the tree given these suggestions. The light distribution was improved by up to 25.15\%, demonstrating a 16\% improvement over commercial pruning on a real tree, and certain cut points were discovered which improved light distribution with a smaller negative impact on tree volume. The final results suggest value in the framework as a decision making tool for commercial growers, or as a starting point for automated pruning since the entire process can be performed with little human intervention.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.