Paper detail

A procedural framework and mathematical analysis for solid sweeps

Sweeping is a powerful and versatile method of designing objects. Boundary of volumes (henceforth envelope) obtained by sweeping solids have been extensively investigated in the past, though, obtaining an accurate parametrization of the envelope remained computationally hard. The present work reports our approach to this problem as well as the important problem of identifying self-intersections within the envelope. Parametrization of the envelope is, of course, necessary for its use in most current CAD systems. We take the more interesting case when the solid is composed of several faces meeting smoothly. We show that the face structure of the envelope mimics locally that of the solid. We adopt the procedural approach at defining the geometry in this work which has the advantage of being accurate as well as computationally efficient. The problem of detecting local self-intersections is central to a robust implementation of the solid sweep. This has been addressed by computing a subtle mathematical invariant which detects self-intersections, and which is computationally benign and requires only point queries.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.