Paper detail

A Probabilistic Method for Nonlinear Robustness Analysis of F-16 Controllers

This paper presents a new framework for controller robustness verification with respect to F-16 aircraft's closed-loop performance in longitudinal flight. We compare the state regulation performance of a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and a gain-scheduled linear quadratic regulator (gsLQR), applied to nonlinear open-loop dynamics of F-16, in presence of stochastic initial condition and parametric uncertainties, as well as actuator disturbance. We show that, in presence of initial condition uncertainties alone, both LQR and gsLQR have comparable immediate and asymptotic performances, but the gsLQR exhibits better transient performance at intermediate times. This remains true in the presence of additional actuator disturbance. Also, gsLQR is shown to be more robust than LQR, against parametric uncertainties. The probabilistic framework proposed here, leverages transfer operator based density computation in exact arithmetic and introduces optimal transport theoretic performance validation and verification (V&V) for nonlinear dynamical systems. Numerical results from our proposed method, are in unison with Monte Carlo simulations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.