Paper detail

A probabilistic cellular automaton that admits no successful basic i.i.d. coupling

In this paper, we revisit a classic example of probabilistic cellular automaton (PCA) on {0, 1} Z , namely, addition modulo 2 of the states of the left-and right-neighbouring cells, followed by either preserving the result of the addition, with probability p, or flipping it, with probability 1 -- p. It is well-known that, for any value of p $\in$]0, 1[, this PCA is ergodic. We show that, for p sufficiently close to 1, no coupling of the PCA dynamics based on the composition of i.i.d. random functions of nearest-neighbour states (we call this a basic i.i.d. coupling), can be successful, where successful means that, for any given cell, the probability that every possible initial condition leads to the same state after t time steps, goes to 1 as t goes to infinity. In particular, this precludes the possibility of a CFTP scheme being based on such a coupling. This property stands in sharp contrast with the case of monotone PCA, for which, as soon as ergodicity holds, there exists a successful basic i.i.d. coupling.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.