Paper detail

A probabilistic approach to the Erdös-Kac theorem for additive functions

We present a new perspective of assessing the rates of convergence to the Gaussian and Poisson distributions in the Erdös-Kac theorem for additive arithmetic functions $ψ$ of a random integer $J_n$ uniformly distributed over $\{1,...,n\}$. Our approach is probabilistic, working directly on spaces of random variables without any use of Fourier analytic methods, and our $ψ$ is more general than those considered in the literature. Our main results are (i) bounds on the Kolmogorov distance and Wasserstein distance between the distribution of the normalized $ψ(J_n)$ and the standard Gaussian distribution, and (ii) bounds on the Kolmogorov distance and total variation distance between the distribution of $ψ(J_n)$ and a Poisson distribution under mild additional assumptions on $ψ$. Our results generalize the existing ones in the literature.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.