Paper detail

A priori bounds for co-dimension one isometric embeddings

We prove a priori bounds for the trace of the second fundamental form of a $C^4$ isometric embedding into $R^{n+1}$ of a metric $g$ of non-negative sectional curvature on $S^n$, in terms of the scalar curvature, and the diameter of $g$. These estimates give a bound on the extrinsic geometry in terms of intrinsic quantities. They generalize estimates originally obtained by Weyl for the case $n=2$ and positive curvature, and then by P. Guan and the first author for non-negative curvature and $n=2$. Using $C^{2,α}$ interior estimates of Evans and Krylov for concave fully nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations, these bounds allow us to obtain the following convergence theorem: For any $ε>0$, the set of metrics of non-negative sectional curvature and scalar curvature bounded below by $ε$ which are isometrically embedable in Euclidean space $R^{n+1}$ is closed in the Hölder space $C^{4,α}$, $0<α<1$. These results are obtained in an effort to understand the following higher dimensional version of the Weyl embedding problem which we propose: \emph{Suppose that $g$ is a smooth metric of non-negative sectional curvature and positive scalar curvature on §^n$ which is locally isometrically embeddable in $R^{n+1}$. Does $(S^n,g)$ then admit a smooth global isometric embedding into $R^{n+1}$?}

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.