Paper detail

A principle of corresponding states for two-component, self-gravitating fluids

Macrogases are defined as two-component, large-scale celestial objects where the subsystems interact only via gravitation. The macrogas equation of state is formulated and compared to the van der Waals equation of state for ordinary gases. By analogy, it is assumed that real macroisothermal curves in macrogases occur as real isothermal curves in ordinary gases, where a phase transition takes place along a horisontal line in the macrovolume-macropressure (Mv-Mp) plane. A simple guidance case and two density profiles which satisfactorily fit to observations or simulations, are studied in detail. For sufficiently steep density profiles, a critical macroisothermal curve exists as shown by ordinary gases, where the critical point coincides with the horisontal inflexion point. By analogy with ordinary gases, the first quadrant of the (Mv-Mp) plane may be divided into three parts, namely (i) the G region, where only gas exists; (ii) the S region, where only stars exist; (iii) the GS region, where both gas and stars exist. An application is made to a subsample of elliptical galaxies investigated within the SAURON project. Different models characterized by equal subsystem mass ratio and different scaled truncation radii, are considered and the related position of sample objects on the (Mv-Mp) plane is determined. Tipically, fast rotators are found to lie within the S region, while slow rotators are close (from both sides) to the boundary between the S and the GS region. The net effect of the uncertainty affecting observed quantities, on the position of sample objects on the (Mv-Mp) plane, is also investigated. Finally, a principle of corresponding states is formulated for macrogases with assigned density profiles and scaled truncation radii.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.