Paper detail

A Predicted New Population of UV-faint Galaxies at z>4

We show that a bursty model of high redshift star formation explains several puzzling observations of the high redshift galaxy population. We begin by pointing out that the observed specific star formation rate requires a duty-cycle of ~10%, which is much lower than found in many hydro-dynamical simulations. This value follows directly from the fact that the observed star formation rate in galaxies integrated over a Hubble time exceeds the observed stellar mass by an order of magnitude. We use the large observed specific star formation rate to calibrate the efficiency of feedback in a model for the high redshift star formation rate which includes merger driven star formation regulated by SNe feedback. This model reproduces the star formation rate density function and the stellar mass function of galaxies at 4<z<7. A prediction of the model is that the specific star formation rate does not evolve very rapidly with either mass or redshift, in agreement with observation. This is in contrast to results from hydrodynamical simulations where the star formation closely follows the accretion rate, and so increases strongly towards high redshift. The bursty star formation model naturally explains the observation that there is not enough stellar mass at z~2-4 to account for all of the star-formation observed, without invoking properties like an evolving initial mass function of stars. The finding of a duty cycle that is ~10% implies that there should be ten times the number of known galaxies at fixed stellar mass that have not yet been detected through standard UV selection at high redshift. We therefore predict the existence of a large undetected population of UV-faint galaxies that accounts for most of the stellar mass density at z~4-8.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.