Paper detail

A precursor interpretation for the Crab supernova 1054 A.D. very early light curve

In spite that the Crab supernova in 1054 A.D. was studied over the years, it is still not clear what type of event produced the explosion. The most detailed and reliable source of the observed light curve is recorded in the Chinese and Japanese chronicles, and suggests a quick dimming after a very bright initial peak. We shall show in this work that the Crab event can be well explained by a type of precursor, a phenomenon emerging from large supernova sampling and quite expected from Stellar Evolution considerations of low-mass progenitors. This very early bright transient is followed by the explosion itself, likely a low-luminosity supernova from ``small iron core'' type instead of an electron-capture event. The latter conclusion stems from recent simulation work, which predict that an electron-capture supernova would render the magnitude to be much brighter for $\sim 3$ months, hence visible during daytime, and would not match the Chinese records.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.