Paper detail

A precision calculation of the effective number of cosmological neutrinos

The neutrino energy density of the Universe can be conveniently parametrized in terms of the so-called effective number of neutrinos, N_nu^eff. This parameter enters in several cosmological observables. In particular it is an important input in those numerical codes, like CMBFAST, which are used to study the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropy spectrum. By studying the neutrino decoupling with Boltzmann equations, one can show that this quantity differs from the number of massless neutrino species for an additional contribution due to a partial heating of neutrinos during the electron-positron annihilations, leading to non thermal features in their final distributions. In this paper we review the different results obtained in the literature and perform a new analysis which takes into account, in a fully consistent way, the QED corrections at finite temperature to the photon and e^+- plasma equation of state. The value found for three massless active neutrinos is N_nu^eff=3.0395, in perfect agreement with the recommended value used in CMBFAST, N_nu^eff=3.04. We also discuss the case of additional relativistic relics and massive active neutrinos.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.