Paper detail

A Precise Photometric Ratio via Laser Excitation of the Sodium Layer I: One-photon Excitation Using 342.78 nm Light

The largest uncertainty on measurements of dark energy using type Ia supernovae is presently due to systematics from photometry; specifically to the relative uncertainty on photometry as a function of wavelength in the optical spectrum. We show that a precise constraint on relative photometry between the visible and near-infrared can be achieved in upcoming surveys (such as in LSST at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory) via a mountaintop-located laser source tuned to the 342.78 nm vacuum excitation wavelength of neutral sodium atoms. Using a high-power (500 W) laser modified from laser guide star studies, this excitation will produce an artificial star (which we term a "laser photometric ratio star," or LPRS) of de-excitation light in the mesosphere that is observable from the ground at approximately 20 magnitude (i.e., well within the expected single-image magnitude limit of LSST) at wavelengths in vacuum of 589.16 nm, 589.76 nm, 818.55 nm, and 819.70 nm, with the sum of the numbers of 589.16 nm and 589.76 nm photons produced by this process equal to the sum of the numbers of 818.55 nm and 819.70 nm photons, establishing a precise calibration ratio between, for example, the LSST r and z filters. This technique can thus provide a novel mechanism for establishing a spectrophotometric calibration ratio of unprecedented precision, from above most of the Earth's atmosphere, for upcoming telescopic observations across astronomy and atmospheric physics. This article is the first in a pair of articles on this topic. The second article of the pair describes an alternative technique to achieve a similar, but brighter, LPRS than the technique described in this paper, by using two mountaintop-located lasers, at optical frequencies approximately 4 GHz away from resonances at wavelengths in vacuum of 589.16 nm and 819.71 nm respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.