Paper detail

A practical guide to the recovery of wavelet coefficients from Fourier measurements

In a series of recent papers (Adcock, Hansen and Poon, 2013, Appl. Comput. Harm. Anal. 45(5):3132-3167), (Adcock, Gataric and Hansen, 2014, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7(3):1690-1723) and (Adcock, Hansen, Kutyniok and Ma, 2015, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47(2):1196-1233), it was shown that one can optimally recover the wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from pointwise evaluations of its Fourier transform via the method of generalized sampling. While these papers focused on the optimality of generalized sampling in terms of its stability and error bounds, the current paper explains how this optimal method can be implemented to yield a computationally efficient algorithm. In particular, we show that generalized sampling has a computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(M(N)\log N)$ when recovering the first $N$ boundary-corrected wavelet coefficients of an unknown compactly supported function from $M(N)$ Fourier samples. Therefore, due to the linear correspondences between the number of samples $M$ and number of coefficients $N$ shown previously, generalized sampling offers a computationally optimal way of recovering wavelet coefficients from Fourier data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.