Paper detail

A Posteriori and A Priori Error Estimates of Quadratic Finite Element Method for Elliptic Obstacle Problem

A residual based {\em a posteriori} error estimator is derived for a quadratic finite element method (fem) for the elliptic obstacle problem. The error estimator involves various residuals consisting the data of the problem, discrete solution and a Lagrange multiplier related to the obstacle constraint. {\em A priori} error estimates for the Lagrange multiplier have been derived and further under an assumption that the contact set does not degenerate to a curve in any part of the domain, optimal order {\em a priori} error estimates have been derived whenever the data and the solution are sufficiently regular, precisely, under the sufficient conditions required for quadratic fem in the case of linear elliptic problem. The numerical experiments of adaptive fem for a model problem satisfying the above condition on contact set show optimal order convergence. This demonstrates that the quadratic fem for obstacle problem can exhibit optimal performance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.