Paper detail

A possible solution to the Milky Way's binary-deficient retrograde stellar population. Evidence that $ω$ Centauri has formed in an extreme starburst

Context. The fraction of field binaries on retrograde orbits about the Milky Way is significantly lower compared to its prograde counterpart. Chemical and dynamical evidence suggests that the retrograde stellar population originates from $ω$ Centauri, which is either the most massive globular cluster (GC) of the Milky Way or the putative core of a former dwarf galaxy. Aims. Star formation conditions required to produce the retrograde binary population are constrained assuming that the retrograde stellar population originates from $ω$ Centauri's progenitor. Methods. We match the observed low binary fraction with dynamical population synthesis models, including a universal initial binary population and dynamical processing in star clusters, making use of the publicly available binary population synthesis tool BiPoS1. Results. It is found that either the GC progenitor of $ω$ Centauri must have formed with a stellar density of $\approx 10^8 \; M_{sun} \; pc^{-3}$ or the $ω$ Centauri dwarf galaxy's progenitor star cluster population must have formed in an extreme starburst with a star formation rate exceeding $1000 \; M_{sun} \; yr^{-1}$ and probably a top-heavy embedded-cluster mass function with suppressed low-mass cluster formation. The separation and mass ratio distribution for retrograde field binaries are predicted for comparison with future observations. Conclusions. A viable solution for the deficiency of binaries on retrograde orbits is presented, and star formation conditions for $ω$ Centauri as well as orbital parameter distributions for the Milky Way's retrograde binary population are predicted. The dwarf galaxy origin for $ω$ Centauri is tentatively preferred within the present context.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.