Paper detail

A Possible Solution to the Helium Anomaly of EMPRESS VIII by Cuscuton Gravity Theory

We discuss cosmology based on the cuscuton gravity theory to resolve the anomaly of the observational $^4$He abundance reported by the EMPRESS collaboration. We find that the gravitational constant $G_{\rm cos}$ in Friedmann equation should be smaller than the Newton's constant ${G_{\rm N}}$ such that ${ΔG_{\rm N}}/{G_{\rm N}} \equiv (G_{\rm cos}-G_{\rm N})/{G_{\rm N}} = -0.085_{-0.028}^{+0.026} \quad(68 \% \text { C.L. })$ in terms of big-bang nucleosynthesis, which excludes ${ΔG_{\rm N}}=0$ at more than 95~$\% \text { C.L. }$ To fit the data, we obtain a negative mass squared of a non-dynamical scalar field with the Planck-mass scale as $\sim - {\mathcal{O}}(1) {M_{\rm PL}^2} (μ/{0.5 M_{\rm PL}})^{4}$ with the cuscuton mass parameter $μ$. This fact could suggest the need for modified gravity theories such as the cuscuton gravity theory with a quadratic potential, which can be regarded as the low-energy Hořava-Lifshitz gravity and might give a hint of quantum gravity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.