Paper detail

A possible link between brittle and ductile failure by viewing fracture as a topological defect

A continuum model of fracture that describes, in principle, the propagation and interaction of arbitrary distributions of cracks and voids with evolving topology without a fracture criterion is developed. It involves a 'law of motion' for crack-tips, primarily as a kinematical consequence coupled with thermodynamics. Fundamental kinematics endows the crack-tip with a topological charge. This allows the association of a kinematical conservation law for the charge, resulting in a fundamental evolution equation for the crack-tip field, and in turn the crack field. The vectorial crack field degrades the elastic modulus in a physically justified anisotropic manner. The mathematical structure of this conservation law allows an additive 'free' gradient of a scalar field in the evolution of the crack field. We associate this naturally emerging scalar field with the porosity that arises in the modeling of ductile failure. Thus, porosity-rate gradients affect the evolution of the crack-field which, then, naturally degrades the elastic modulus, and it is through this fundamental mechanism that spatial gradients in porosity growth affects the strain-energy density and stress carrying capacity of the material - and, as a dimensional consequence related to fundamental kinematics, introduces a length-scale in the model. The key hypothesis of this work is that brittle fracture is energy-driven while ductile fracture is stress-driven; under overall shear loadings where mean stress vanishes or is compressive, shear strain energy can still drive shear fracture in ductile materials.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.